Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Michael ScottIn re: Michael Scott
as 22-10341
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL L. SCOTT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Scott v. US
as 21-1420
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SAExploration Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08423
Defendant:
Brent N Whiteley, SAExploration Holdings, Inc., Brian A Beatty and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
USA v. Michael Spitzauer
as 20-35840
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PETER SPITZAUER, AKA Michael Peter Scott Spitzauer McCune
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott v. US
as 20-1898
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In Re: Scott
as 19-1701
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
US v. Scott
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
In Re: Scott
as 19-1160
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Ford Plantation Club Inc, The v. Scott et al
as 2:2018mc00258
Plaintiff:
Ford Plantation Club Inc, The
Defendant:
Michael L Scott and Nancy J Scott
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
