Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant:
VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Michael McCarthy, et al v. IAM, et al
as 21-1673
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS and MICHAEL PERRY, President of IAM District Lodge 19
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EDDIS and MICHAEL MCCARTHY
Plaintiff:
RANK AND FILE MEMBERS OF IAM DISTRICT LODGE 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv00083
Undetermined:
MATTHEW WHITAKER, LYNNE P. SKEIRIK, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Plaintiff:
Safiyyah Islam, Hannan M Niaz and NO PARTY
McCarthy et al v. Verizon
as 1:2018cv04497
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy, Michael McCarthy, MM and others
Defendant:
Verizon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarthy et al v. Trans Union et al
as 1:2018cv04495
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy, V.M., M.M. and others
Defendant:
Trans Union, Equifax and Experian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarthy et al v. Bank Of America
as 1:2018cv04493
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy, SM, MM, VM and RM and Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
Bank Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
