Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rolon v. City of New York
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
KAYLA ROLON, COREY GILZEAN, MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor BILL DE BLASIO and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
USA v. Miguel Cruz-Medina
as 22-10144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL CRUZ-MEDINA, AKA Miguel Cruz
Cruz-Perez de Miguel v. Garland
as 21-6241
Petitioner:
KRISTEL TATIANA MIGUEL-CRUZ and FRANCISCA CRUZ-PEREZ DE MIGUEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz Alfaro v. Barr
as 20-2421
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Luis Miguel Cruz Alfaro, AKA Luis Cruz
US v. Jose Vidal
as 19-4360
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIZ SANTILLAN VIDAL, a/k/a Jose Gusman, a/k/a Jose Lopez, a/k/a Miguel Cruz, a/k/a Jose Luis Santellan, a/k/a Rodolfo Coronado, a/k/a Jose Lopez Guzman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Adams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11493
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cruciata, Timothy Branan, John Scanlon and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Aguirre v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv01006
Plaintiff:
Miguel Cruz Aguirre
Defendant:
Jefferson Sessions, Kirstjen Nielsen, Mark Siegl and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Miguel Cruz Saldana v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72924
Petitioner:
MIGUEL CRUZ SALDANA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
United States v. Miguel Gonzalez
as 11-1349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Miguel Cruz Gonzalez, also known as Miguel De La Cruz Gonzalez, also known as Miguel Gonzalez Cruz, also known as Antonio Velqasquez
Cruz-Alvarez, et al v. Holder
as 08-60447
Petitioner:
MIGUEL CRUZ-ALVAREZ and YANIRA YAMILETH GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
