Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Miles v. HHS
as 19-1480
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK MILES, legal representative of a minor child J.M.
Mary E. Miles, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as CAC/2:17-cv-01987
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Miles and Mark Miles
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Synthes, Inc. , Johnson and Johnson and others
MILES et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00254
Petitioner:
MARK MILES and JACKSON MILES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
DEUTSCHER TENNIS BUND (GERMAN TENNIS FEDERATION) et al v. ATP TOUR, INC. et al
as 1:2007mc00129
Plaintiff:
DEUTSCHER TENNIS BUND (GERMAN TENNIS FEDERATION), DEUTSCHER TENNIS BUND (GERMAN TENNIS FEDERATION), ROTHENBAUM SPORTS GMBH and others
Defendant:
ATP TOUR, INC., ATP TOUR, INC., JOHN DOE 1 and others
Miscellaneou:
MARK MILES and MARK MILES
Miles v. Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01617
Plaintiff:
Mark Miles, Mark Miles, Mark Miles and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant:
Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party:
James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master:
Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robin McEntee
In Re:
Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other:
Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
