Cases 1 - 10 of 1,335
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2027
Petitioner:
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, P.T.M., S.T.M. and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Martinez Sarmiento, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2821
Petitioner:
ADRIANA MARTINEZ SARMIENTO, JHAIR MEJIA SANCHEZ, EMMANUEL MEJIA MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Leon Mejia v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1948
Petitioner:
Juan Rufino Leon Mejia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mejia-Reyes v. Garland
as 24-2667
Petitioner:
LUIS EDUARDO MEJIA-REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
White Hat v. Landry
as 24-30272
Plaintiff:
Anne White Hat, Ramon Mejia, Karen Savage and others
Defendant:
Jeff Landry, in his official capacity as Attorney Generalof Louisiana, M. Bofill Duhe, in his official capacity as District Attorney of the16th Judicial District Attorney's Office and Becket Breaux, in his official capacity as Sheriff of St. Martin Parish
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner:
ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Juan Mejia-Moran v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1313
Petitioner:
JUAN RAMON MEJIA-MORAN and J.J.M.A.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mejia v. US Bank
as 3:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Graciela H Mejia
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
