Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Monet v. State of Hawaii, et al.
as 24-253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MONET
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, in his official capacity and EDWARD UNDERWOOD, DLNR Administrator in his official and individual capacity
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03082
Plaintiff:
Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and Rebecca Froehlich
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as MN/0:23-CV-03082
Plaintiff:
Jonas, Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and others
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A, EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Torrey v. Infectious Diseases Socty
as 22-40728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Torrey, Kathryn Kocurek, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of J. David Kocurek, Ph.D., Amy Hanneken and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Infectious Diseases Society of America
Torrey v. Infectious Diseases Socty
as 21-40782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Torrey, Kathryn Kocurek, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of J. David Kocurek, Ph.D., Amy Hanneken and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Infectious Diseases Society of America, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Aetna, Incorporated and others
Monet Jones v. WMATA, et al
as 21-7030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Monet Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Bus Driver, Individual and Professional Capacity and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Craig Slavin v. Rebecca Monet, et al
as 20-55549
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURENCE FREDERICK HAINES and REBECCA MONET
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG S. SLAVIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
