Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Kelly Clark, Jr. v. Glenn Payne
as 21-6634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLY JAMES CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
LOUISA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TOMMY PAYNE, Louisa Sheriff Department, MR. MILLER, Correctional Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLBY MILLER, formerly employed by the Central Virginia Regional Jail Authority (CVRJA), OFFICER GLENN TOMMY PAYNE, Louisa County Sheriffs Department and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KEVIN CARL, Correctional Officer: Central Virginia Jail
Tony Mutschler v. Brenba Tritt, et al
as 20-2022
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. MILLER, D.S.F.M., BRENBA L. TRITT, MS. STANISHESKI, C.H.C.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY LEE MUTSCHLER
Abreu v. Miller
as 19-557
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Lyon, Supervisor/Sgt.; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, John Doe, #1, #2, #3, #4, Correction Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Mr. D. Venettozzi, Director of Special Housing Unit and others
Defendant:
Walker, Nurse; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Ms. H. Larrow, Sr. Librarian; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Mr. Thoms, First Superintendent; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
In re National Heritage Foundation, Inc.
as 2:2015mc00205
Appellant:
Mrs. Behrmann, John R. Behrmann, Mr. Bloss and others
In Re Debtor:
National Heritage Foundation, Inc.
Appellee:
National Heritage Foundation, Inc.
FRANK BRETT V. TIA MARIE GIORGINI, ET AL
as 2:2012cv01571
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
TIA MARIE GIORGINI, TIA MARIE BARBAS, DAWN & ROBERT LAWFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stagg et al v. Ford Motor Credit CSV LLC et al
as 8:2007cv01103
Plaintiff:
Travis Stagg, Travis Stagg, Jennifer Stagg and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit CSV LLC, Delta Human Resources, Inc., Brad Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
