Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Schopp v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 4:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
George Kenneth Schopp
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rojas v. Cordoba Legal Group LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03264
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group LLC, National Debt Relief LLC, Alfredo Cordoba and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lentz v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 1:2021cv00143
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court-Gulfport
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Trustee:
United States Trustee
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Lentz
Emery v. National Debt Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv03334
Defendant:
NATIONAL DEBT RELIEF, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shayne Emery
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Karestin Thompson v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 2:2020cv02868
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Plaintiff:
Karestin Thompson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Omeed Tabiei v. National Debt Relief LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02627
Plaintiff:
Omeed Tabiei
Defendant:
National Debt Relief LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Clayton v. National Debt Relief LLC
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Laurence Clayton
Defendant:
National Debt Relief LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Clayton v. National Debt Relief LLC
as 1:2017at00262
Plaintiff:
Laurence Clayton
Defendant:
National Debt Relief LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
