Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Jones v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Wallace v. JP Morgan Private Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Wallace
Defendant:
JP Morgan Private Bank, James M. Inhofe, Jack Kirkpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council, et al v. EPA
as 22-1139
Petitioner:
Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council, Joseph S. D'Aleo, Clement Dwyer, Jr. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Appalachian Mountain Club and others
Amicus Curiae:
William Happer, Christopher Field, Richard S. Lindzen and others
Stephen WallaceIn re: Stephen Wallace
as 22-11363
Petitioner:
In re: STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. TOMASINO et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA and STEPHEN P WALLACE
Defendant:
JOHN A TOMASINO, COLE SCOTT AND KISSANE PA, CARLOS H GAMBOA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Durham et al
as 3:2020cv01448
Defendant:
John Does, John H. Durham and Jane Does
Interested Party:
USA
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Wallace
State of California et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
