Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PYKE v. SN SERVICING CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff: BRIAN PYKE
Defendant: SN SERVICING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite et al v. City of Bainbridge Island et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05491
Plaintiff: Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite, Lee Rosenbaum, Janice Pyke and others
Defendant: The City of Bainbridge Island, Kolby Medina, Morgan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PYKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-25530
Plaintiff: PYKE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
PYKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-08531
Plaintiff: PYKE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
United States of America v. Schmidt Lithograph Co. et al
as 2:2019mc00096
Defendant: United States Printing & Lithograph Company of California, Wallace Martin, W. E. Steege and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Orlando Pyke v. U.S. Attorney General
as 18-11868
Petitioner: ORLANDO ADOLPHUS PYKE
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
CMH Homes, Inc. et al v. Pyke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00077
Plaintiff: CMH Homes, Inc. and Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Defendant: Richard Douglas Pyke and Christine Romano Pyke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
James Dixie v. USDC-CAC
as 08-74404
: In re: JAMES LEWIS DIXIE
Petitioner: JAMES LEWIS DIXIE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: M. YARBOROUGH, D. K. DOWNS, GONZALEZ and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PYKE
as 4:2008mc00002
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: RICHARD D. PYKE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?