Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1298
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Wages and White Lion Invest v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-60766
Petitioner: Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., doing business as Triton Distribution
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration
Amicus Curiae: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Association and others
Not Classified By Court: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60545
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association and others
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae: 24 Vaping Product Industry Advocacy Associations
Philip Morris Products S.A. v. ITC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1227
Appellant: PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC
Appellee: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Intervenor: RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC., R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1099
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
R.J. Reynolds v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-60128
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent: United States Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1049
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60037
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC et al C v. R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2021mc00103
Plaintiff: ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and U.S. SMOKELESS TOBACCO COMPANY LLC
Defendant: R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY and MODORAL BRANDS, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01990
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and Summer Stephan
Plaintiff: Neighborhood Market Association, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Petitioner: Mental and Public Health Organizations
Amicus Curiae: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Lung Association, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?