Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Ragan v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Michael Ragan, Tamim Altamimi, Fernando Sulichin and others
Petitioner:
KAUNDRIA WEST and Eduardo Archer Veloso Martins
Defendant:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
IN RE FARFETCH LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2023cv10982
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Wu and Michael Ragan
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael Bievetski, Eduardo Archer Veloso Martins, Renoporto-Investimentos Imobiliarios, LDA and others
Defendant:
Farfetch Limited, Jos Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Ragan v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 8:2023cv02857
Plaintiff:
Michael Ragan
Defendant:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
D.K. v. N.G., et al
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
D. K. and B. C.
Defendant:
Tad Pshigoda, M. S., J. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ragan Pest Management v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Ragan Pest Management
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
