Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01156
Petitioner:
RICHARD ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BNSF Railway Company v. Richard Rogers
as 22-8003
Petitioner:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Respondent:
RICHARD ROGERS
Crystal Rivers v. United States of America
as 21-2408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRYSTAL VL RIVERS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, BILL TALBOTT, VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION and others
Defendant:
KAREN DEER, MARYLOU PRILLIMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Crystal Rivers v. United States of America
as 21-2248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRYSTAL VL RIVERS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, BILL TALBOTT, VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION and others
Defendant:
KAREN DEER, MARYLOU PRILLIMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1162
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bloom v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Margaret Sepe, Melissa Molly, as Parent and Natural Guardian of M.M., Wally Reynolds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Roy's Plumbing, Inc., Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, City of Niagara Falls and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-2290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Rogers v. Postmates, Inc.
as 20-16529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ROGERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMATES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rogers v. Postmates Inc.
as 3:2019cv05619
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
