Cases 1 - 10 of 72
ROLLER v. EXCENTUS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
LESLIE ROLLER
Defendant:
EXCENTUS CORPORATION and VIBES MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CIRANNI et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
PIETRO CIRANNI, PAUL BRUMLEY, CHAD SCHOFIELD and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Mooney v. Roller Bearing Company of America Inc
as 23-3683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MOONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLER BEARING COMPANY OF AMERICA INC
Mooney v. Roller Bearing Company of America Inc
as 23-3552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD MOONEY
Defendant / Appellant:
ROLLER BEARING COMPANY OF AMERICA INC, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Stephen Malloy v. City of San Francisco, et al
as 21-16544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON and others
Stephen Malloy v. Regents of the University, et al
as 21-16535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Defendant / Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, STEVE BUSTAMANTE, UCOP Chief of Ethics & Compliance Attorney, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Tubular Rollers, LLC v. Maximus Oilfield Products, LLC
as 21-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUBULAR ROLLERS, LLC, ROLLING TOOL, INC. and H. LESTER WALD
Defendant / Appellee:
MAXIMUS OILFIELD PRODUCTS, LLC, NABORS INDUSTRIES, LTD. and NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
