Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Hill et al v. APM Terminals North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80016
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill, JERI STEWART, Rhonda Johnson and others
Defendant:
APM Terminals North America, Inc., APM TERMINALS PACIFIC, LLC, Maersk A/S and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
D. Deaton, et al v. Agnes Chappell, et al
as 23-13622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D. DEATON, T. PEAKE, J.K.D. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AGNES CHAPPELL, PATRICIA STEPHENS, ALISHA RUFFIN MAY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BAY AREA CHRISTIAN COUNSELING, LLC and KIRK.DRENNAN P.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Michael RuffinIn re: Michael Ruffin
as 23-12810
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL RUFFIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Rodney RuffinIn re: Rodney Ruffin
as 23-5717
Petitioner:
In re: RODNEY JAMES RUFFIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ruffin v. Department of Homeland Security - Customs Border Protection et al
as 4:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shahmael Ruffin
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security - Customs Border Protection and Raymond Bell
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
