Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Shire LLC et al v. Meijer, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10479
Petitioner:
Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc.
Respondent:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distributions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant:
Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mark Blackburn v. Shire US Inc, et al
as 20-12258
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRE US INC and SHIRE LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK BLACKBURN
LCS Group, LLC v. Shire LLC
as 19-2404
Defendant / Appellee:
Shire LLC, Shire Development LLC, Haug Partners LLP and others
Appellant:
Foundation Law Group LLP and Stephen M. Lobbin
Defendant:
Baker Hostetler, LLP
Plaintiff:
LCS Group, LLC
Picone, et al v. Shire US Inc., et al
as 19-8023
Not Yet Classified:
SHERRI CUMMINSFORD, SHIRE LLC, SHIRE US INC. and others
Interested Party:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2008cv02141
Intervenor:
PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, URL PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC.
Respondent:
MATTHEW PIKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Intuniv Antitrust Litigation v. Shire LLC
as 6:2018mc00062
Petitioner:
Laurence F. Doud and Laurence F. Doud, III
In Re:
Intuniv Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
Shire LLC
Respondent:
Shire PLC and Shire U.S. Inc.
SHIRE LLC et al v. ABHAI, LLC
as 2:2018mc00187
Plaintiff:
SHIRE LLC and SHIRE US INC.
Defendant:
ABHAI, LLC
J M Smith Corporation v. Shire LLC et al
as 1:2017cv10229
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation
Defendant:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
