Cases 1 - 10 of 350
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES and STEVEN P. ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Southwest Airlines Co. v. FERC, et al
as 24-1064
Petitioner:
Southwest Airlines Co.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
US, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 24-1092
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
BOEING CO., UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arcell, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 23-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE R. ARCELL, JOSE M. BRITO, JAN-MARIE BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY NIEBOR, GABRIEL GARAVANIAN and JUNE STANSBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES, UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
US, et al v. American Airlines Group Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC.
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
Interested Party:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., DELTA AIR LINES, INC., GLEN HAUENSTEIN and others
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adrian Bombin, et al v. Southwest Airlines Co
as 23-8040
Petitioner:
ADRIAN BOMBIN and SAMANTHA ROOD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant:
Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant:
OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant:
Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant:
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Southwest Airlines Co v. Scott Moss et al
as 1:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Southwest Airlines Co
Defendant:
Scott Moss Official Capacity as Director of Division of Labor Standards, Scott Moss and Philip J. Weiser
Intervenor Defendant:
Transport Workers Union, Local 556
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest v. Sabre Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02725
Plaintiff:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Petitioner:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., oneworld Management Company, Inc., Expedia, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Inc., Sabre Travel International Limited and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Carlson Wagonlit Travel
Not Classified By Court:
Brussels Airlines N.V., Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. and Austrian Airlines AG
Interested Party:
Farelogix and Travelport L.P.
Amicus Curiae:
Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Inc., Virgin America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
