Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
State of New Mexico, ex rel. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01115
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico, ex rel.
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff: State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee: Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant: Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
Balderas, et al v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al
as 21-9593
Petitioner: THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General and the New Mexico Environment Department
Respondent: UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Balderas v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00255
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc. a Delware Corporation, Gilead Sciences, LLC (f/k/a Bristol Myers Squibb & Gilead Sciences, LLC), Bristol Myers Squibb, a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico ex rel Hector Balderas and Hector L Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Balderas v. Google
as 20-2172
Defendant / Appellee: GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF NEW MEXICO, EX REL. HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00992
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee: Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff: ABC
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National, et al
as 19-7025
Plaintiff: State of Iowa, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Schneider and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chase Home Finance, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Laurence Schneider
Not Yet Classified: United States of America
Balderas v. Tiny Lab Productions et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00854
Defendant: Twitter Inc., Mopub Inc., Google Inc and others
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico ex rel Hector Balderas, Attorney General and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?