Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Larry Klayman v. Neomi Rao, et al
as 21-5269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Neomi Rao, Hon., Robert Leon Wilkins, Hon., Laurence H. Silberman, Hon. and others
In re: T. Edward Williams
as 21-1101
Respondent:
PATRICK S. LAYNG, United States Trustee for Region 19
Petitioner:
T. EDWARD WILLIAMS
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY T. EDWARD SHARDLOW
as 1:2020mc00050
In Re:
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY T. EDWARD SHARDLOW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Harmon v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Eldridge J. Harmon
Defendant:
Louisiana State, James Caldwell, David Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Edwards v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv01629
Plaintiff:
Kirk T. Edwards
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , California Reconveyance Company and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ralph Janvey v. Juan Rodriguez Posada, et al
as 13-10212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH S. JANVEY, in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Ltd et al
Defendant - Appellant:
J. G. MCKOWEN, MARILYN M. MCKOWEN, CHRISTOPHER D. MUNYON and others
Appellant:
DALE LAWRENZ, MARILYN LAWRENZ, NANCY K. JOHNSON and others
Ralph Janvey v. Juan Rodriguez Posada, et al
as 13-90008
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RALPH S. JANVEY, in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Ltd et al
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D. MUNYON, MARIA ELENA MUNYON, R. EDWARD ROYBAL MDPA PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
M. A. et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2010cv00625
Plaintiff:
H. A., Jr., M. A., Tiffany Garcia and others
Defendant:
Does, Frederick T. Edwards and United States Department of Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
