Cases 1 - 10 of 121
US v. Warlin Tejeda
as 24-6539
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WARLIN ANTONIO MATEO TEJEDA
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Paz Tejeda v. Garland
as 22-1442
Petitioner:
MONICA KARINA PAZ TEJEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tejeda Barojas v. Garland
as 23-197
Petitioner:
CRUZ ALEJANDRO TEJEDA BAROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Juan Tejeda
as 23-13004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN TEJEDA
USA v. Carlos Tejeda, et al
as 23-12989
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS TEJEDA
United States v. Juan Tejeda-Quiroz
as 23-1445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Antonio Tejeda-Quiroz, also known as Juan Tejeda-Villa
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Unlimited Investments, Inc. v. US Fresh Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv02832
Plaintiff:
Unlimited Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
US Fresh Corp., JCJ Marketer Corp., Gonzalo Jaramillo and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Tejeda Herrera v. Garland
as 22-60200
Petitioner:
Salvador Tejeda Herrera
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
