Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Harris County, TX, et al
as 22-3493
Petitioner: In re: HARRIS COUNTY, TX, ROCKWALL COUNTY, TX, ELLIS COUNTY, TX and others
Not Classified By Court: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Respondent: PLAINTIFFS' EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Parrish v. City of Austin
as 21-51054
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lawrence Parrish
Defendant / Appellee: City of Austin, Dane O'Neill, Officer, Austin Police Department, Paul Bianchi, Officer, Austin Police Department and others
SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT v. CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00148
Plaintiff: SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Defendant: CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA and CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Virden v. City of Austin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50597
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jennifer Virden
Defendant / Appellee: City of Austin, Texas
Wesley Perkins v. Whitney Brewster, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50678
Plaintiff / Appellant: Wesley Perkins
Defendant / Appellee: City Attorney Anne Morgan, Officially and Individually, Judge Lee Yeakel, Southside Wrecker, a commercial enterprise and others
Ravindra Singh v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 20-50637
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ravindra Singh, Ph.D.
Defendant / Appellee: City of Austin, Officer John Doe, I, in his individual and official capacity and Ex-Police Chief Art Acevedo, in his official capacity
Amy Smith, et al v. City of Austin, et al
as 20-50197
Defendant / Appellee: MARGARET MOORE, Travis County District Attorney, TRAVIS COUNTY, ART ACEVEDO, Former Austin Police Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELA FIELDING, JULIE ANN NITSCH, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, EMILY BORCHARDT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?