Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Singer
as 23-6120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. SINGER, AKA Christopher Whitefield, AKA Christopher Whitfield
Whitfield v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitefield and Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
United States of America v. Burroughs (Whitefield)
as 21-3052
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antoine Burroughs, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Ty
Defendant / Appellant:
Leon Whitefield, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Butter, AKA Youngblood
Casey Baker, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1845
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Casey Baker, Don Franklin, Jonathan Knight and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
WHITEFIELD v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 2:2021cv01384
Plaintiff:
ANDREA WHITEFIELD
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. William Whitefield
as 21-1682
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. WHITEFIELD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Can't Stop Productions, Inc v. Sixuvus, Ltd.
as 20-2227
Intervenor:
Karen Willis, DBA Harlem West Entertainment
Counter Claimant:
Eric Anzalone, Alexander Briley, Raymond Simpson and others
Plaintiff:
Can't Stop Productions, Inc
In Re: Karen L. Willis
as 20-1639
Respondent:
Sixuvus, Ltd, Raymond Simpson, Felipe Rose and others
Petitioner:
Karen Willis, DBA Harlem West Entertainment
William Whitefield v. Warden, Fed Corr Inst
as 20-5210
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM WHITEFIELD
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MANCHESTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
