Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gamero-Larin v. Garland
as 22-60656
Petitioner:
William Alexander Gamero-Larin
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
BUSHNELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
PRUDENCE BUSHNELL, RICHARD BUCKLEY, SUSAN BUSHNELL and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Sarvia-Soriano v. Garland
as 22-273
Petitioner:
WENDY MARICELA SARVIA-SORIANO and WILLIAM ALEXANDER ZAMORA-SARAVIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Denise Chavez et al v. Tsungju Olee et al
as 5:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Denise Chavez, Miguel R Luna, Sr., Miguel Luis Cruz Heriberto Luna, 2nd and others
Defendant:
Tsungju Olee, Chris Smith, William Alexander Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Vigil Rivera v. Garland
as 21-148
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ALEXANDER VIGIL RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: William Townsend
as 21-10392
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM ALEXANDER TOWNSEND
Bob Anderson v. City of Fulton, KY, et al
as 21-5001
Defendant / Appellee:
LONNIE BELL, individually, JAMES R. BUCKINGHAM, II, individually, JOHN TILLEY, individually and others
Defendant:
CITY OF FULTON, KY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOB ANDERSON, Administrator of the Estate of Charles Christopher McClure, Deceased, and Next Friend of S.M., B.M., and C.M., Minor Daughters of Mr. McClure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
