Cases 1 - 10 of 14
In Re: Artis, et al
as 14-1718
Respondent:
ANNETTE G. YOUNG, LARRY J. MCCULLOCH, PATRICIA C. MCCULLOCH and others
Petitioner:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Interested Party:
SHARON OVERSTREET, PAIN CONSULTANTS OF WEST FLORIDA, ROCHESTER BRAIN AND SPINE NEUROSURGERY & PAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Johnson, et al v. Ameridose, LLC, et al
as TNM/3:13-cv-00942
Plaintiff:
William E. Johnson, Sr. and Sandra J. Johnson
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC , Medical Sales Management, Inc. , Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the U.S., et al
as 11-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the US, et al
as 10-20558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Sonintel Sociedade National De Industria Telecomunicacoes Ltda et al v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2010cv02107
Plaintiff:
Sonintel Sociedade National De Industria Telecomunicacoes Ltda, Jose Daniel Martin Catoira, Affonso Feijo Da Costa Neto and others
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States , AT&T Inc , Edward E Whitacre, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
William E. Johnson v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76157
Plaintiff:
William E. Johnson
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
