Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Khavinson v. Lieberman et al
as 1:2026cv02701
Defendant:
Lev Lieberman, United Trade Market, Good Trader and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Khavinson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WIN Waste Innovations of Seneca County LLC v. Coppeler et al.
as 3:2024cv01553
Defendant:
Commissioner Mark Coppeler, Commissioner Scott Miller, Commissioner Charlie Schwochow and others
Plaintiff:
WIN Waste Innovations of Seneca County LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cupersmith v. Piaker & Lyons, P.C.
as 17-373
Petitioner:
Neal A. Cupersmith, Frances Cupersmith, Cynthia Robbins and others
Respondent:
Piaker & Lyons, P.C., Ronald L. Simons and Timothy N. Paventi
Mikkin et al v. Beverly Hills Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Donna Mikkin and Edward Mikkin
Defendant:
Beverly Hills Group, Inc., Jeffrey Thomas, Danielle Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rizzi et al
as 2:2012cv02526
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Domenico Rizzi and Paradiso Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2006md01775
Defendant:
One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3978, JSNP, INC v. ACE Aviation Holdings, INC, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1503, Rosetti Handbags and Accessories, Ltd. v. Air France ADS et al, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2157, Perlman v. British Airways PLC et al and others
Interested Party:
John Doe, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2260, Antell v. British Airways PLC et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-706 Fleurchem, Inc. v. British Airways et al, DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc.,11-cv-00564 and others
In Re:
Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Intervenor:
US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
Not Classified By Court:
Brickman Concerts Inc. and I.O.D. Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
