Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Swift Solutions Pro LLC v. Fowlkes
as 1:2017cv00877
Plaintiff:
Swift Solutions Pro LLC
Defendant:
Krystal Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 6.31 Acres of Land More or Less in Marshall County, West Virginia et al
as 5:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
6.31 Acres of Land More or Less in Marshall County, West Virginia, Brian K. Milliken , Mary Lynn Milliken and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
The Park at Edinburgh v. Swift
as 1:2016cv03440
Plaintiff:
The Park at Edinburgh
Defendant:
James Swift
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yellowstone Poky, LLC et al v. First Pocatello Associates, L.P. et al
as 4:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Yellowstone Poky, LLC and Roger Featherston
Defendant:
First Pocatello Associates, L.P. and Earl T. Swift Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swift Energy Operating, LLC v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Swift Energy Operating, LLC
Defendant:
William Brents Lee and William Brents Lee Lands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Millwood Park Apartments et al v. Swift
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Millwood Park Apartments and Hammond Residential
Defendant:
Latisha Swift
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Swift et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacob O'Neal Swift, Kirstie Diane Swift and Grayson County, KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Swift Solutions Pro, LLC v. Fowlkes
as 1:2015cv03192
Plaintiff:
Swift Solutions Pro, LLC
Defendant:
Krystal Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Swift Solutions Pro, LLC v. Fowlkes
as 1:2015cv02212
Plaintiff:
Swift Solutions Pro, LLC
Defendant:
Krystal Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Richard Symanski et al v. Jonathan Swift et al
as 2:2015cv03569
Defendant:
Does and Jonathan Swift
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Symanski and Richard Symanski
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
