Cases 21 - 30 of 116
Smith v. Lebbetter et al
as 3:2020cv00864
Plaintiff:
Josh Anthony Smith, III
Defendant:
G. Mandi Loupassi, Nelly Nunn, "Mr. Wallace" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Woodbury et al
as 9:2020cv80757
Plaintiff:
Dicky Theron Thomas
Defendant:
Katey Thomas, Melbourn Dixon, Dedra Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Residential Holdings, LLC v. JTB Investments LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00483
Defendant:
Russel Arthur Strom, Does 1-25, Peter Strom and others
Plaintiff:
American Residential Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Armstrong v. Mega Investment Group, LLC
as 1:2019cv02784
Plaintiff:
Ruth B. Armstrong
Defendant:
Mega Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28:l332
Armstrong v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 4:2019cv00402
Defendant:
NewRez LLC, Bank of New York Mellon and NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. The Bank Of New York Mellon et al
as 4:2019cv00038
Defendant:
NewRez LLC and The Bank Of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mega Investment Group, LLC v. Armstrong
as 1:2018cv05569
Plaintiff:
Mega Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Ruth B. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong v. PHH Mortgage Services
as 1:2018cv05108
Plaintiff:
Ruth B. Armstrong
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28:l332
Windward Bora LLC v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2018cv06355
Defendant:
Adrian Armstrong, Platinum Financial Services Corp., Kings County Court and others
Plaintiff:
Windward Bora LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Armstrong et al v. C. R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00891
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Simon, Carolyn D. Armstrong and Robert N. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
