Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Watkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ronnie W. Watkins and Teresa H. Watkins
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arium Kennesa Villas et al v. Watkins
as 1:2018cv00242
Defendant:
Destiny Watkins
Plaintiff:
Arium Kennesaw Villas and Carroll Management Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watkins v. Ditech Financial LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv02247
Plaintiff:
Chanell S. Watkins
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC , Federal National Mortgage Association and NBS Default Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AFFHO Capital, LLC v. Watkins
as 1:2017cv23852
Plaintiff:
AFFHO Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Inita Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Watkins et al
as 3:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Crystal Cryshell Watkins , Unknown Spouse of Crystal Watkins and Shelbyville, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
West Morgan - East Lawrence v. Charles Owens, et al
as 17-12381
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHARLES OWENS, ANGELIA ABBASI, MOHAMMAD ABBASI and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEST MORGAN-EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, TOMMY LINDSEY, LANETTE LINDSEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, DYNEON, LLC and DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.
:
SERVICE
Peterson v. Zions Bank et al
as 2:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Brandon Peterson
Defendant:
Zions Bank and Halliday Watkins & Mann
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0191
Watkins v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 4:2016cv02398
Plaintiff:
Anieze M. Watkins
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Envision Property Management Services v. Watkins,
as 1:2016cv02418
Plaintiff:
Envision Property Management Services
Defendant:
Tanill L. Watkins,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WATKINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01765
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BILLIE J. WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
