Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Norwood v. Ethicon et al
as 4:2014cv01243
Plaintiff:
Catherine Norwood
Defendant:
Ramesh Krishnan , Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutchinson et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv24153
Plaintiff:
Elsa Hutchinson and Douglas Hutchinson
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, a Division of Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laura Gharibyan v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08275
Defendant:
Does and Ethicon Inc
Plaintiff:
Laura Gharibyan
Colon-Morales v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01513
Plaintiff:
Gabriel A. Colon-Morales
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sugg et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv02477
Plaintiff:
Lenda Sugg and Ernest Sugg
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv01157
Plaintiff:
Theresa Gross , Joyce Heffernan , Leigh Leal and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., ETHICON SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOWERS et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02571
Plaintiff:
LISA FLOWERS and KEITH FLOWERS
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., ETHICON SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Susan Clones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moosman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01030
Plaintiff:
Donna Moosman and Joe Moosman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
Tracey Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
