Cases 51 - 60 of 313
Butler-Stern et al v. Memmott et al
as 1:2017cv01782
Plaintiff:
Norma E. Butler-Stern and James Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Jay Memmott and Seterus Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01569
Plaintiff:
Donna James and Marvin James
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Garson et al v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02418
Plaintiff:
Laurie K Garson and Michael J. Garson
Defendant:
Service Link Services, Inc. and Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Lassiter v. Seterus, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Lorna Lassiter
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae") v. Seterus Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02903
Defendant:
Executive Trustee Services Inc, Home Savings of America FSB, JP Morgan Chase and others
Movant:
Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae")
Jeffrey Michael Frick v. Seterus Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02908
Defendant:
Does, Executive Trustee Services, Inc., Federal National Mortgage Assocation and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Michael Frick
David Lacayo v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02783
Defendant:
Does, Federal National Mortgage Association and Seterus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Lacayo
Bossie v. Seterus Inc
as 3:2017cv00993
Plaintiff:
Michael Bossie
Defendant:
Seterus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wicker, Jr. v. Seterus, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00099
Third Party Defendant:
Midfirst Bank, a Federally Chartered Savings Association, United States of America Internal Revenue Service and Rocio P. Wicker
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas George Wicker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Reaves v. Seterus Inc.
as 5:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Margaret Reaves
Defendant:
Seterus Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
