Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SBS Trust Deed Network v. Laurence Edward McClung et al
as 2:2023cv10705
Cross Defendant:
Augustine Nwapa Jourdan, The Laurence Edward McClung Jr. Trust, Laurence Edward McClung and others
Plaintiff:
SBS Trust Deed Network
Defendant:
Laurence Edward McClung, Jr., Laurence Edward McClung Jr. Trust and Trustee Mumina A. Rahman
Other:
MAG Holdings Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Hicks et al v. Andrews et al
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
B.F. Hicks, Gary Boren and Kathy Boren
Defendant:
Scott Andrews, Saddle House Solar Project, LLC, Stockyard Solar Project, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Ward et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
Norman Ward, Larry A. Gary, Morris Charles Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ward et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
Norman Ward, Larry A. Gary, Morris Charles Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Boren et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv00699
Plaintiff:
Beth H. Boren and David W. Boren
Defendant:
GE Capital Consumer Card Co., Green Tree Servicing, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Charles Boren, et al v. US National Bank Association
as 14-20718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BOREN and CYNDI BOREN
Defendant - Appellee:
US NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION
Boren et al v. US National Bank Association
as 4:2013cv02160
Plaintiff:
Charles Boren and Cyndi Boren
Defendant:
US National Bank Association
Counter_claimant:
US National Bank Association
Counter_defendant:
Charles Boren and Cyndi Boren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
