Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tweed et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04180
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tweed, Angela Martin, James Phillip Mikles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Tweed et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv06608
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tweed, Angela Martin, James Phillip Mikles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Erick Aguilar Ruiz v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 13-2318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERICK AGUILAR RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, NATASHA BARONE, Substitute Trustee, HUTCHENS, SENTER, BRITTON, PA and others
Defendant:
GMAC, BANK
RUIZ v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2012cv00272
Plaintiff:
ERICK AGUILAR RUIZ
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, HUTCHENS, SENTER & BRITTON, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Flick et al v. Bank of Utah et al
as 2:2011cv00506
Plaintiff:
Nitai Flick and Asha Flick
Defendant:
Bank of Utah, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and BAC Home Loans Servicing
Counter_claimant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Counter_defendant:
Asha Flick and Nitai Flick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacheco v. Flick Mortgage Investors Inc et al
as 1:2011cv20341
Plaintiff:
Jose Enrique Pacheco
Defendant:
Flick Mortgage Investors Inc, Americas Servicing Company and Mortgage Electronic Registrations Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Washington Mutual Bank v. Flicke et al
as 1:2007cv00864
Plaintiff:
Washington Mutual Bank
Defendant:
Dennis L. Flicke, Unknown Spouse, if any, of Dennis L. Ficke and Hamilton County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
