Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saw Y Shin v. Howard Jerome Edwards et al
as 5:2019cv00094
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Howard Jerome Edwards
Plaintiff:
Saw Y Shin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West Lumberton Baptist Church et al v. CSX Corporation et al
as 7:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Currie Chain Saw, Inc., West Lumberton Baptist Church, C.J.M. Ventures, Inc. and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. and CSX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Saw Creek Estate Community Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Saw Creek Estate Community Association, Inc., Peter Derrenbacher, Eugene Farrell and others
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Saw Creek Estate Community Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
Saw Creek Estate Community Association, Inc., Peter Derrenbacher, Eugene Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elvenia Bratton v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, et al
as 12-55279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVENIA BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, SCOTT ANDERSON, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, MERS and others
Elvenia Bratton v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, et al
as 11-56815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELVENIA BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, SCOTT ANDERSON, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, MERS and others
Elvenia Bratton v. Ocwen Loan Servicing et al
as 2:2010cv09462
Defendant:
Scott Anderson, Aztec Foreclosure Corporation, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Elvenia Bratton
Rhodes v. Morgan Saw Company
as 4:2009cv01431
Plaintiff:
Michael C Rhodes
Defendant:
Morgan Saw Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhodes v. Morgan Saw Company
as 1:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Rhodes
Defendant:
Morgan Saw Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
