Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Brown et al v. Mohamed et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter Brown and Kathryn Brown
Defendant:
Hassan A. Mohamed, Swift Transportation Services, LLC and Esurance Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ludvik, Michael v. Roby, John et al
as 3:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Ludvik
Defendant:
John W. Roby , Barrett Directline Delivery Service , American Alternative Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Searcy v. Esurance Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00047
Defendant:
Esurance Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Searcy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Grigsby et al v. Great West Casualty Company et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Shannon Grigsby and Bronson Ryan Byrnes
Defendant:
Great West Casualty Company, Esurance Insurance Company, MAG Carriers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QAWIY v. BATIZ-PEREZ et al
as 3:2012cv01361
Plaintiff:
JAMEELAH QAWIY
Defendant:
NELLIE A. BATIZ-PEREZ, FEMA, PV HOLDING CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Varnum v. Esurance Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv14431
Plaintiff:
Matthew Varnum
Defendant:
Esurance Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALONSO-MOSQUEA v. HENREY et al
as 2:2011cv05223
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER A. ALONSO-MOSQUEA
Defendant:
STEPHEN D. HENREY, BRADD GADD, TRADEMARK TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Snow et al
as 3:2010cv00542
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Joseph Brown, Jr. and Stevie Brown
Defendant:
Esurance Insurance Company and Tonya D. Snow
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Ford et al v. Krout et al
as 2:2009cv03784
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E Ford and Genevieve W. Ford
Defendant:
Philip E. Krout, Sr., Philip E. Krout, Sr., Esurance Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
