Cases 11 - 20 of 33
LANE et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMPSON, LUCIUS SYKES, DEREK BRADHAM and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lane et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02235
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson, Lucius Sykes, Derek Bradham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WOOD v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03245
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antonelli et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11775
Plaintiff:
Kevin Comer, Wayne Wichern, Falamarz Youseflaleh and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Acciarito et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11483
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lindberg, Roger Delucia, John Castoria and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Wood v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04690
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2016cv01033
Plaintiff:
ETHEL THOMAS WOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
WOOD v. BOEING COMPANY
as 1:2016cv01149
Defendant:
BOEING COMPANY
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
AIR CRASH OVER THE SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN, ON MARCH 8, 2014
as 1:2016mc01184
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WOOD , THOMAS C. GASPARD, ELIZABETH SMITH and others
Defendant:
MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD, MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD , ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE AND SPECIALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2016cv04154
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
