Cases 11 - 17 of 17
DAVIS v. ROMERO et al
as 2:2011cv05634
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
JIOVANNI ROMERO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Butler v. United States of America, Department of the Army
as 2:2011cv02243
Plaintiff:
Belinda Butler
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAYS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 2:2010cv02905
Plaintiff:
TYRONE MAYS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and DANIEL CAHILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smithson et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
Robert Smithson and Betty Smithson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America Department of the Army, Government Technical Services, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Al-Khazraji v. United States of America, Department of the Army
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv00521
Plaintiff:
Omran Al-Khazraji
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Estate of Shannon Marie Boone et al v. United States of America Department of the Army
as 1:2008cv00658
Plaintiff:
Estate of Shannon Marie Boone, Mark A. Boone, Debbie L. Ramsburg Whipp and others
Defendant:
United States of America Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SALWEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 3:2007cv02893
Plaintiff:
RONALD SALWEN and DIANA SALWEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and JOHN AND JANE DOE CONTRACTORS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.