Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Yates et al v. Guidotti
as 1:2019cv01012
Plaintiff:
Ms. Lisa Starr Yates, Mr. Charles Lewis Yates, Mr. Kevin Charles Yates, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Mr. John Patrick Guidotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dickey et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv11417
Plaintiff:
Ms. Joanne Kelly, Mr. Kyle Sliwak, Mr. John O'Brien and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Lopez v. Ramirez
as 1:2018cv09042
Defendant:
Mr. William Ramirez, Jr., Mr. John Doe and William Ramirez, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Ms. Janee Lopez and Janee Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quedraogo et al v. Newsholme
as 1:2018cv06916
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jean Francois Combary, Mr. Noufou Quedraogo, Noufou Quedraogo and others
Defendant:
Mr. John F. Newsholme and John F. Newsholme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Doe v. Salem Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv11531
Defendant:
Mr. Brian Butler, Salem Police Department and City of Salem
Plaintiff:
Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiMatteo v. Raymond et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Defendant:
Raymond, Mr. John Thomas Raymond, Mr. Kevin Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
DiMatteo and Deborah DiMatteo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2010md02197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel-California, Plaintiffs Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel-New Jersey and others
Petitioner:
Steven M. Johnson, Dr. David Langton and Dr. Antoni Nargol
Defendant:
Defendants' Liaison Counsel, Sang Ho Jeong, Medical Device Business Services, Inc. and others
Respondent:
William Scott Drake
Interested Party:
MedStar Funding, LC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saunders v. Salem Veterans Administration Medical Center et al
as 7:2010cv00183
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Camden, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Dr. Thomas Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Marie Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
