Cases 31 - 40 of 244
Angela Heard v. Torrance Memorial Medical Center
as 23-55345
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANGELA HEARD, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, a Nonprofit Corporation
County of Monmouth, et al v. Rite Aid Corp, et al
as 23-1655
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF MONMOUTH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DIANE SCAVELLO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
RITE AID CORP and RITE AID HDQTRS CORP
Commissioners of Public Works of The City of Charleston d/b/a Charleston Water System v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Defendant:
3M Company, The, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Charleston Water System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Aviva Kirsten, et al v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
as 23-55288
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN DATA BREACH LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AVIVA KIRSTEN and JEREMY PITTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KANSAS GILLEO, SYDNEY RUSEN, ESTEBAN MORALES and others
Commissioners of Public Works for The City of Charleston d/b/a Charleston Water System v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01075
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Commissioners of Public Works for The City of Charleston Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Charleston Water System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant:
Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee:
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Juan Quintanilla Vasquez, et al v. Libre by Nexus, Inc.
as 23-15278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, GABRIELA JAMILETH PERDOMO ORTIZ, VICTOR HUGO CATALAN MOLINA and others
Appellant:
MICHAEL DONOVAN, RICHARD MOORE and EVAN AJIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.
M.Z. v. CENTRASTATE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC et al
as 3:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
M.Z. Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and M.Z.
Defendant:
CENTRASTATE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC and Shaunna Ellison
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
The Estate of Carson Bride, et al v. Yolo Technologies, Inc., et al
as 23-55134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF CARSON BRIDE, by and through his appointed administrator KRISTIN BRIDE, A. K., by and through her legal guardian Jane Doe 1, A. C., by and through her legal guardian Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
YOLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and LIGHTSPACE, INC.
John Doe, I, et al v. BJC Health System
as 23-1107
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Doe, I, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and John Doe, II, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
BJC Health System, doing business as BJC Healthcare
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
