Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Zarkevics et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Baloh, Joshua Dreisbach, Jonathan Burrell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02120
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00895
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
JOHNSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09140
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00503
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2019cv01057
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2019cv00359
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seth Romero et al v. Brian Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv01920
Defendant:
Brian Johnson, Does 1 through 50 and Arizona Corporate Coach
Plaintiff:
Seth Romero and Summer Scales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv01897
Defendant:
Brian Johnson, Does 1 through 50 and Arizona Corporate Coach
Plaintiff:
Seth Romero and Summer Scales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
EVANS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01495
Plaintiff:
JAMI HENNESSY, DEBORAH CARUSO, KIM COMBS and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
