Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Edward McGuire, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-1725
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD C. MCGUIRE and DEBBIE MCGUIRE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Ryan v. United States Postmaster General et al
as 3:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
Kristian M. Ryan
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Shirley v. Potter et al
as 1:2009cv21311
Plaintiff:
Marleny S Shirley
Defendant:
John E. Potter and Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0633 Job Discrimination (Age)
Garcia v. Potter et al
as 0:2008cv62012
Plaintiff:
Valentin R. Garcia
Defendant:
John E. Potter, Postmaster General* and United States Postal Service Agency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Larcart v. Postal Service et al
as 1:2008cv01371
Plaintiff:
Crystal Renee Larcarte
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, U S Attorney General, U S Postmaster General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Simon et al v. Postmaster General
as 6:2008cv01182
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Simon and Margaret Simon
Respondent:
U S Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. Postmaster General
as 6:2008cv01181
Respondent:
U S Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BIGUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2008cv03230
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. BIGUM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tracey Williams v. Postmaster General
as 08-1725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACEY JO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL, John E. Potter
Velazquez-Linares v. United States Government, et al
as 08-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA VELAZQUEZ-LINARES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, Government, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
