Cases 41 - 50 of 14,118
Jones, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Dana Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simmons v. Genesee, County of et al
as 4:2024cv10815
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, CHS TX, Inc, Genesee, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04105
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jones
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Staci Jones
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jones v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04059
Plaintiff:
Penelope Jones
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01323
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Tuana Jones
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mark Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02490
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Andrea Ratfield, et al v. United States Drug Testing Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
ANDREA RATFIELD, ANN MARIE KELLY, BRIAN RAY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., DOUGLAS LEWIS and JOSEPH JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
