Cases 41 - 50 of 279
Chan v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07574
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Chan
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv22931
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chan v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv05181
Plaintiff:
Shirley Chan
Defendant:
Target Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Chan v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv02200
Plaintiff:
Shirley Chan
Defendant:
Target Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
CHAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15722
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chan v. Preferred Therapy Solutions et al
as 1:2022cv02990
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CHAN
Defendant:
Preferred Therapy Solutions and Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Cordes v. Mead School District No. 354 et al
as 2:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Braeden Cordes
Defendant:
Mead School District No. 354, Ryan Chan, Gilbert Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan v. Ramdhaney et al
as 1:2022cv03708
Plaintiff:
Lap-Sun Chan
Defendant:
Susan Ramdhaney, MD, Manhattan Gastroenterology, Luis Castelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Rosado et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Chan Rosado and Carla Rosado
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chan v. Scartine
as 2:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Kevin Chan
Defendant:
William Scartine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
