Cases 41 - 47 of 47
HENRY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2014cv03899
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY , CHERYL HENRY , PERRY KLEIN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. Henry
as 4:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
Stephen Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. Schneider et al
as 4:2010cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Fox
Defendant:
Janet Schneider, Bronie Walker, Rubeno Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietzmann et al v. City of Homer et al
as 3:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cherry Dietzmann , Jason Anderson and Darla Anderson
Defendant:
City of Homer , The Homer Police Department , Mark Robl and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
City of Homer
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States of America , United States Marshal's Office , Kevin Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dietzmann et al v. City of Homer et al
as 3:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
Cherry Dietzmann, Cherry Dietzmann, Cherry Dietzmann and others
Defendant:
City of Homer, The Homer Police Department, Mark Robl and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
City of Homer
ThirdParty Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshal's Office, Kevin Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Hill, et al
as 1:2009cv00654
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Smith
Defendant:
Bobby Lebarry Hill, Lexus of Mobile/Springhill Toyota/Springhill Automotive Group, Lexus of North America/Toyota Motor Sales, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Coppock et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
Bruce Coppock, Bruce Coppock, Michael Henry and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jeffery N Luthi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
