Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 763
Stevens et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10819
Plaintiff: Barbara Stevens, Charles Borchard, Dennis Borchard and others
Petitioner: Dalweet Kaur Doing business as Edenville Market
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
THOMAS v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv20969
Plaintiff: RANDI THOMAS, individually and as parent of A.T., a minor and RANDI THOMAS
Defendant: Carnival Corporation, d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. and Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
M.A.N.H. et al v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00372
Plaintiff: M.A.N.H. individually and as parent and next friend of his minor child, E.B.N.A. and M.A.N.H.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Brashevitzky et al v. Covanta Holding Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv20861
Plaintiff: Rabbi Avrohom Brashevitzky, Maria Alejandra Duran and Total Cycling Mechanical Corp.
Defendant: Covanta Holding Corporation, Covanta Dade Renewable Energy, EQT Infrastructure Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
K.K., a minor, by and through her Parents, natural guardians and next friends, T.K. and S.K. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
as 1:2023cv20857
Plaintiff: K.K., a minor, by and through her Parents, natural guardians and next friends, T.K. and S.K.
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
LESTER et al v. QUIGLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff: LASHAE LESTER, MICHAEL GAITHER and LASHAE LESTER, AS PARENT AND NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR DONALD MCGAHA, III
Defendant: BRIAN S QUIGLEY and FFE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Havlish v. Bin-Laden
as 23-258
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fiona Havlish, Russa Steiner, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of William Steiner, deceased, Clara Chirchirillo, in her own right and as executrix of the estate of Peter Chirchirillo and others
Defendant: Sheikh Usama Bin-Laden, The Taliban, Muhammad Omar and others
Appellee: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, In her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Tom Sawyer, a fictitious name, deceased and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, as Representative of the Heirs, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, Deceased, on behalf of the Solatium claimants, including Katherine Soulas, Frederick Soulas, II, Ti
Defendant / Appellee: The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Laden, AKA Osama Bin-Laden and Al Qaida/Islamic Army
Sidik v. Royal Sovereign International, Inc.
as 23-107
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas Sidik, as Administrator of the Estate of Kristen A. Sidik, deceased, as Parent and Natural Guardian of K.S., an Infant, as Parent and Natural Guardian of C.S., an Infant, Individually
Defendant / Appellee: Royal Sovereign International, Inc., Royal Centurian Inc., RS Ningbo, Inc. and others
Jocelyn Elliker, et al v. USA
as 22-17027
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOCELYN ELLIKER, CARRIE ROMO, as the parent and guardian ad litem for B.E., MEGAN ROMO ELLIKER, individually and as the Executor of the Estate of James Elliker and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: CHRISTOPHER A. HART
Amie Drammeh, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-36038
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMIE DRAMMEH, YUSUPHA CEESAY, Individually and as surviving parents of Cherno Ceesay and MARAM CEESAY, Personal Representative of the estate of Cherno Ceesay
Defendant / Appellee: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, RASIER, LLC and DOES, 1-100, inclusive

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?