Cases 41 - 50 of 63
TROTTER et al v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
JAMES TROTTER and LORI TROTTER
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION , RAYMOND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT LIMITED , TOYOTA INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rigsby v. John Doe(s) 1-6
as 2:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Shirley Rigsby
Defendant:
Medline Industries, Inc. , The Raymond Corporation and John Doe(3) 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Geyri Aguilar v. The Raymond Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Geyri Aguilar
Defendant:
Does and The Raymond Corporation
Carlos Ruiz et al v. The Raymond Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv00219
Defendant:
DOES and The Raymond Corporation
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ruiz and Leticia Ruiz
GLIELMI v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv05734
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GLIELMI
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lawrence v. The Raymond Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01067
Plaintiff:
Carol L Lawrence
Defendant:
The Raymond Corporation, Andersen & Associates, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. Raymond Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Christian Daniels
Defendant:
Raymond Corporation and Heubel Matrial Handling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burkland v. Raymond Corporation, The et al
as 5:2009cv00224
Plaintiff:
Monique Burkland
Defendant:
Raymond Corporation, The, Huebel Materials Handling Inc and John Ramsey
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Serquina v. The Raymond Corporation
as 1:2008cv01741
Defendant:
The Raymond Corporation
Plaintiff:
Urbano Serquina
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. v. Raymond Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv02632
Plaintiff:
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. and Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
Defendant:
Raymond Corporation, Andersen & Associates, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
