Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff:
MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Randolph Morton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv05956
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, -, CBS Corporation (f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger with CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to BF STURTEVANT) and others
Plaintiff:
Edna S. Morton and Randolph Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Betzner et al v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2018cv01294
Plaintiff:
Bruce Betzner and Barbara Betzner
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mestas et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01006
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Mestas, Sr. and Lori Ann Muse
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump Company , Borgwarner Morse Tec, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robins et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04111
Plaintiff:
Dennis Robins and Christine Robins
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. , Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical Inc., and Cutler-Hammer, Inc. , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. , Alfa Laval, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZUPANCIC et al v. BOEING CO. et al
as 2:2017cv01944
Plaintiff:
JACK L. ZUPANCIC and CATHY ZUPANCIC
Defendant:
BOEING CO. , BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION , LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cross_defendant:
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION , BOEING CO. , BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Hukkanen, et al v. Foster Wheeler, LLC, et al
as 17-55476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN HUKKANEN and MARY HUKKANEN
Defendant - Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, as successor in interest to Foster Wheeler Corporation and Foster Wheeler Energey Corporation
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ALBAY CONSTRUCTION CO., ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP. and others
John Hukkanen, et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv02227
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Albay Construction Co., Allied Fluid Products Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hukkanen and Mary Hukkanen
Movant:
Pneumo Abex LLC
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
