Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Thurler et al v. Popejoy
as 6:2013cv01073
Plaintiff:
Tara Thurler , Mel Gregory and Jennifer Stultz
Defendant:
William W. Popejoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Thomas et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp23604
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dee Thomas and Mel Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv02014
Plaintiff:
Mel Harrison
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCONAUGHY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
MEL MCCONAUGHY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
MCCONAUGHY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00889
Plaintiff:
MEL MCCONAUGHY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
BERNABE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51564
Plaintiff:
MEL G. BERNABE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Marin v. Escondido Care Center et al
as 3:2011cv01610
Plaintiff:
Mel M. Marin
Defendant:
Escondido Care Center, Mek Escondido, L.L.C., Edward Keh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marin v. La Paloma Healthcare Center et al
as 3:2011cv01609
Plaintiff:
Mel M. Marin
Defendant:
La Paloma Healthcare Center, Italian Maple Holdings, LLC, Plum Healthcare Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marin v. Richter et al
as 3:2011cv01603
Plaintiff:
Mel M. Marin
Defendant:
Michael Richter, Michael McGrath, Law Firm of Mesch, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
