Cases 61 - 70 of 615
BOOTHE v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
SHARNET BOOTHE
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOOTHE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA BOOTHE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rios-Hernandez v. Scanning Devices, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Laura Rios-Hernandez
Defendant:
Scanning Devices, Inc., Advanced Packaging Concepts, LLC, Booth & Harris Distributing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Boothe v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Marinus Boothe
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dodge-Booth v. SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 1:2022cv02580
Plaintiff:
Marji Dodge-Booth
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alfonso v. Booth et al
as 0:2022cv61850
Plaintiff:
Livan Alfonso
Defendant:
Bryan David Booth and D & D Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
BOOTHE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17651
Plaintiff:
DONNY BOOTHE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOOTH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17524
Plaintiff:
MARCUS BOOTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOOTH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17131
Plaintiff:
ZACKARY BOOTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOOTH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13829
Plaintiff:
DERRICK KEVIN BOOTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
