Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr., Elnora Bell and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Dow Chemical Company, Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DAVIS v. A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 2:2008cv78775
Plaintiff:
HUEY B. DAVIS, HUEY B. DAVIS and HUEY B. DAVIS
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77285
Plaintiff:
QUINCY B. DAVIS
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. PNGI Charles Town Gaming LLC
as 3:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Alice B Davis
Defendant:
PNGI Charles Town Gaming LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2007cv06883
Plaintiff:
Virda Bell Bullard, John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DAVIS v. PNGI CHARLES TOWN GAMING LLC
as 2:2007cv02352
Plaintiff:
ALICE B. DAVIS
Defendant:
PNGI CHARLES TOWN GAMING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. Davis et al
as 7:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Hubert Anderson, III and John Davis
Defendant:
David B. Davis, David B. Davis, Jessie Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Thompson, et al v. St. Paul Travelers
as 5:2004cv00342
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hazard, Vincent James Gugliemo, Berta Cortan and others
Defendant:
St. Paul Travelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
