Cases 81 - 87 of 87
Roundtree et al v. Atlantic Development and Investment et al
as 2:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Sheila T. Roundtree and Major A. Walters
Defendant:
Atlantic Development and Investment, Greater Phoenix Urban League, George Dean and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Mt. Carmel East Health & St. Anns Hospital et al
as 2:2008cv02667
Plaintiff:
Berniece Williams
Defendant:
Mt. Carmel East Health & St. Anns Hospital, Peter Van Ligten, Columbus Division of Police and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Erickson v. A-C Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2008cv10003
Plaintiff:
Edwin O. Erickson and Edwin O. Erickson
Defendant:
A-C Product Liability Trust, Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Anchor Packing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roundtree et al v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al.
as 1:2007cv22439
Plaintiff:
William Roundtree, William Roundtree, William Roundtree and others
Defendant:
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ALLISON et al v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66353
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE ALLISON, CHARLES E. ALLISON, SANDRA LOIS ALLISON and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Drew et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv01652
Plaintiff:
Vernon Drew, Vernon Drew, Vernon Drew and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
ROUNDTREE et al v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62478
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. ROUNDTREE, CHARLES L. ROUNDTREE, CHARLES L. ROUNDTREE and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A C AND S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
